The biggest difference in the 2 Cameras is the D800 requires more thought into what setting to use (that is why I said it is not easy to use), like in a film camera, it is a learning curve I am willing to put up with. I then tested it in its DX mode, which shots at 24 mega pixel like my D7100 against my D7100 using the same lens on both without moving my tripod, of 100 out of 100 shots, the D800 out preformed the D7100 by at least 50%. From the start with a 35 year old 35 to 120 zoom lens I could see a 3 fold difference in quality just in the automatic setting for snap shoot taking. That is what me made go for the D800 as my first FX camera. I had a few older Niko n Nikor film lenses (full frame-"FX") from the 80's with auto focus and auto aperture capable. ![]() I have a Canon Vixia HFG30 HD with view finder I dedicate for video, so I was not concerned about the video capability of the D800. The only real difference from the newer D800E and D810 I could find was they were enhanced for better HD video, which was claimed to lower the still picture quality. I saw this lightly used excellent condition 36 mega pixel D800 full frame (FX), and checked the reviews as it is 5 years old in the technology world. I, my self thought so too, but something just was not at that 100% level for me. Everyone said my photos were outstanding from Air Shows, Car Races, Scenery, and living History reenactments. for that price, i would want a working flash unit.For years I have been using the Nikon DX series cameras and have acquired many lens for them, my last purchase was a D7100, 24 Mega pixel. also, the D700 comes with a pop-up flash. i would still consider a D700 if: you plan to shoot in extreme low-light and/or have specific 35mm/FX lenses you want to use at their native focal lengths, but if we are just talking about a single 50mm lens, this appears not to be the case. also if video is important to you, a newer body would be much better, as the D700 doesnt have a video capture function. what i mean by that is an entry-level DX body can be had for less $$ which has 2x the resolution of the D700's 12mp sensor. ![]() the D700 was an awesome camera in its time, and i believe the shutter is rated to 150k actuations, but at this point it is not near cutting edge in technology. at the very least i would price out an equivalent (body + lenses) system on DX / APS-C. that can get expensive for full-frame bodies, depending on what lenses you are buying. a camera body by itself is just a camera body you will have to buy lenses for it. Is the price what you would expect in 2016?Īlmost any contemporary DSLR can be used for stop motion animation and product shots. Is this the best camera for my needs at this price and b. Is the price what you would expect in 2016? Ī. ![]() It does not have the flash built in or a cover for the lcd screen, however, I do not see any physical damage, nicks or scrapes and it seems to be functioning properly. He had it on ebay for $950 and includes a 50mm lens, a grip battery pack, a few cards, box, charger and 3 batteries. ![]() I like that I can use an old lens from a nikon film camera I own and I like that it has live view, as I will be using it mostly for stop animation, art, but also for my product shooting for online vintage store. I have never owned a full frame dslr and wanted to upgrade from my little Olympus ep-2. He did not know the shutter count but I found it online by uploading a photo that it is 61,000. He has let me use it for a few days and I am trying to check it out. Hi, I am considering buying a used Nikon d700 from a friend who is a professional photographer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |